Real-World Video Of The Tesla Yoke Steering Wheel Is As Bad As You Think

Illustration for article titled Real-World Video Of The Tesla Yoke Steering Wheel Is As Bad As You Think

Screenshot: Tesla

We’ve discussed the refreshed and technically impressive 2022 Tesla Model S before, and especially some of the UX decisions made, including the inclusion of the cut-down, yokestyle steering wheel that now comes standard on the Model S. While we’ve had a grand time speculating about how shitty using such a steering not-wheel might be, we haven’t really had any direct, empirical evidence. Until now. Yes, someone has driven a brand-new Model S with the yoke, and, yeah, it looks like it kinda sucks.

Advertisement

After last week’s post about Elon Musk equating of human input and error, you’d think I’d have had enough of dead-eyed Muskovites berating me on social media and via-email, but it’s become so common now that I think my body is starting to crave it, like a drug.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at this little neighborhood drive with the yoke:

…and, a part two! This time with verbal commentary:

He does say that it’s getting easier, and he has to think about it less, especially when you stop using “round wheel steering techniques,” or, as many of us like to call it, “all of your previous driving experience.”

At best, I’d say this looks awkward. The elimination of control stalks in favor of those little buttons for turn signals I just can’t see as an improvement, especially because the orientation and location (though I guess your thumb is always near them, or should be, but the whole side that thumb is on can change) of the signal buttons changes as you move the wheel, something that just isn’t a problem with a column-mounted indicator.

Advertisement

Why is this a good idea, again? Because stalks are bad?

Incidental controls aside, it’s the main function of this thing — steering, arguably a big part of driving a car — that seems difficult.

Advertisement

I know there’s an argument that F1 cars use yoke-type wheels, but, remember, F1 cars are set up so that lock-to-lock turning can happen without the hands crossing. F1 cars themselves don’t move the front wheels more than 14 or 20 degrees even on the tightest tracks. F1 designers also don’t want drivers putting hand-over-hand like they’re parallel parking, so F1 cars make do with steering wheels that don’t even do one full turn from lock-to-lock. Again, even on the tightest tracks, they only move between 300 and 400 degrees at most.

The Model S wheel turns about two and a quarter full rotations, or around 800 degrees lock-to-lock according to one owner, which is pretty close to the standard 900 degrees/2.5 turns for most cars, as Jalopnik’s own automotive engineer David Tracy tells me. That is not what a yoke is designed to do.

Advertisement

The only car I’ve driven with a yoke was this:

Illustration for article titled Real-World Video Of The Tesla Yoke Steering Wheel Is As Bad As You Think

Screenshot: Tesla

Advertisement

…which you might recognize as being from a dragster, a car specifically designed to just go straight as much as possible. A yoke is a wheel design that’s shaped that way to discourage a lot of turning, which is why for cars that may need to do a lot of low-speed maneuvering and turning, like a normal street car, a yoke is a pretty crappy design.

I’m sure it’s something a driver could eventually get used to, but that’s very much not the same thing as a new design that actually makes the operation of the machine better.

Advertisement

Here’s a dramatic example of why yoke-type wheels aren’t great for a lot of turning, as demonstrated by installing a yoke in a drift car. If you click the link you can watch and see why it’s not ideal, particularly for the structural integrity of your thumbs.

The yoke design also forces crossed arms a lot, which would be bad if the airbag deployed, and while that’s possible to happen with any wheel, the design of the yoke exacerbates it. The yoke precludes letting a wheel slide back into position and forces your hands to be locked onto the 9 and 3 positions. (I know a lot of track driving demands this, but there aren’t airbags there in track cars and, come on, the Model S is a street car.)

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled Real-World Video Of The Tesla Yoke Steering Wheel Is As Bad As You Think

Screenshot: Tesla

It’d be one thing if this was just an option you could decide to get or not, and I thought that might be the case, but if there’s a place on the Tesla build-and-order-your-Model S section of the website that lets you pick your wheel, I haven’t been able to find it.

Advertisement

Most of the tweets commenting on the video aren’t particularly positive, save for the sprinkling of Tesla apologists and evangelists, but I’d encourage you to watch it and come to your own decisions.

Ideally, you should be able to test it out yourself to see, but in the interim, I guess you could hacksaw off the upper half of your steering wheel and decide if this path is for you.

Advertisement

Oh, and my editor-in-chief (I want to say Ronnie somebody?) all but demanded I make you aware of his yoke bon mot, so here you go:

Advertisement

I’m all for innovation and novel approaches to things we take for granted; often, great new solutions can be found that way. The yoke, though, is different. It’s not really new, as cars with yokes (even sentient cars) have been around for decades. If drivers really wanted a yoke, they could have had a yoke, long ago.

The point is, nobody wanted one. Because for most normal driving, they suck. That seems to be the part Tesla forgot.

Ford Mustang Mach-E v The SUV: The First SUV That Feels Like A Muscle Vehicle

Ever since the new Ford Mustang Mach-E was unleashed onto the market, it’s been making headlines and raking in awards. It’s easy to understand why: Not only is it an SUV-meets-all-electric-vehicle, but it’s functional, technologically cutting edge, and beautiful to boot. It’s a fast, sleek sports SUV that offers versatility and comfortable seating for five.

The multifaceted team who brought the Mustang Mach-E to life wax poetic about the thoughtful and rigorous design process that went into the SUV. G/O Media Studios spoke to three designers who were instrumental in imagining the vehicle. Like the engineers, it’s clear that the designers approached creating the SUV with an eye trained on the user’s experience. The result is an SUV that’s truly special.

When Ford designers set out to reimagine the iconic Mustang, they were understandably daunted. Turning the company’s crown jewel — a muscle car — into an SUV was enormously ambitious. “Everybody is so used to the two-door coupe sports car,” said Rachael Robinson, an Interior Designer at Ford. “That was the biggest challenge — to bring the heritage into the interior.”

Illustration for article titled Ford Mustang Mach-E v The SUV: The First SUV That Feels Like A Muscle Vehicle
Photo: Ford

They started with a copious amount of design research, presenting various mock-ups and asking their audience what they wanted in an SUV. While conducting consumer research during the vehicle design phase, the team observed how users drove and interacted with the vehicle. “We wanted to understand our customer better,” Robinson explained. “We gave them objects that we asked them to put where they thought was best, and to act like they were driving in a normal scenario.”

Insights gleaned from the team’s research led to numerous details meant to make life easier for users. Drivers don’t like to put their purses and bags between the front seats next to their feet, so Ford interior designers incorporated flip-up armrests where bags can easily be stored. Similarly, areas were designed for both drivers and passengers to place their phones, complete with wireless charging pad. Speakers were moved to optimize space in the SUV’s door pockets for storing items such as umbrellas.

A unique feature of the Mustang Mach-E, its 4.7-cubic-foot frunk—or front trunk—is all lined, plastic, and furnished with a drainage hole. The logic behind it, the designers said, is for users to be able to store anything from dirty hiking boots to groceries, without worrying about getting the vehicle wet or grimy. The drain makes it easy to wash.

When customers buy the Mustang Mach-E, they’ll understand that their needs were taken into consideration. “They gave us feedback on where they wanted their things and what they wanted to do with it,” said Interior Designer Josh Greiner. “They’ll know that they helped design the SUV.”

Utility is the hallmark of an SUV, characterized by heftiness, huge wheel arches, visible clearance, and tons of storage space. Ford designers focused on the same practical features, but disguised behind a streamlined profile — bringing the Mustang’s signature style to the vehicle without losing its functionality.

“We were pushing the limits of the proportions and working with our counterparts in engineering to challenge things like roof height to give it a sleek profile,” exterior design manager Chris Walter told G/O Media Studios. The team created what Walter describes as a glossy, blacked out roof ditch. “It tricks the eye in that you’ve got this sleek silhouette,” Walter said. The resulting roofline looks like a coupe, despite a spacious interior with plenty of head space.

“You can tell … how rugged and utilitarian typical SUVs are by looking at them,” Greiner explained. “The Mustang Mach-E hides a lot of it. It doesn’t boast much.”

Illustration for article titled Ford Mustang Mach-E v The SUV: The First SUV That Feels Like A Muscle Vehicle
Photo: Ford

The luxurious simplicity applies to virtually every other feature of the SUV, with high-quality materials used on both the interior and exterior. New grains were chosen for the seats not only to look beautiful, but to add comfort. Every element is refined, precise, and detailed, Robinson told G/O Media Studios. The available B&O® Sound System by Bang and Olufsen soundbar* was one of Robinson’s favorite elements to design. “It has a very luxurious quality that you usually see in a nice home,” she said.

Another testament to the simplicity of the Mustang Mach-E is its instrument cluster. Unlike a large cluster, overcrowded with unnecessary data, it’s modern and minimal. “It’s pared down so that when you’re driving, you’re not distracted by extra graphics and colors,” Greiner said. “A big portion of the interior was making everything very calm and relaxing.”

To the interior design team, serenity — no bombastic, in-your-face features from complex dashboards to clunky vents — is a big part of what sets the Mustang Mach-E apart. “I think that’s the crux of the Mustang Mach-E: It’s more timeless than most SUVs are,” Greiner said.

Mustangs have a history of pushing the boundaries, and this vehicle is a natural extension of the Ford lineup that pushes the car behemoth into the future. The Mustang Mach-E brings the pony car lifestyle to new swaths of the market, including families. “It’s giving all those wonderful traits that people expect with their Mustang,” Walter said. “But it also plays to the strengths of what we do well at Ford, and that’s SUVs.”

Ford has been making cars for more than a century — ample time to refine both engineering and design — and it shows in the all-electric Mustang Mach-E, which combines performance with both style and function.

The accolades won by the Mustang Mach-E have affirmed that the designers’ choices were on point. ”I knew it was a good vehicle,” Greiner said. “I was hoping that people would see that — and it turns out people love it.”

*BANG & OLUFSEN© 2021 and B&O© 2021. BANG & OLUFSEN™ and B&O™ are registered trademarks of Bang & Olufsen Group. Licensed by Harman Becker Automotive Systems Manufacturing Kft. All rights reserved.

Angela Wang is a freelance writer living in Queens.

The article is a sponsored collaboration between Ford and G/O Media Studios.

Battery Swap Stations Are Gaining Momentum In China

Illustration for article titled Battery Swap Stations Are Gaining Momentum In China

Screenshot: Nio

The simplest and most genius-brain solution to charging times and range with EVs isn’t one you’ll find in America. In China, though, it’s gaining ground. All that and more in The Morning Shift for June 2, 2021.

Advertisement

1st Gear: China Is An Alternate Universe For EVs

China is like the American car market in so many ways. It’s huge, for one, (the biggest in the world while we’re number two) and filled with people inexplicably buying sedans and not hatchbacks or wagons. It’s also the biggest market for electric cars in the world, and you see as many Teslas bopping around Shanghai as you do here in New York or Los Angeles.

But China also offers us a market where GM builds small, adorable, unbelievably popular EVs as opposed to 9,000-pound hulking Hummers for the rich. It feels like an alternate reality where everyone takes EVs as a given, not as a radical tech.

This is a long intro to the point that battery-swapping stations are taking off there, as noted in this overview story by Automotive News China:

Until 2019, state-owned BAIC Motor Co. and EV startup Nio were the only two automakers offering battery swap services for customers.

[…]

Competition from Tesla and Nio’s success in gaining customers with battery swap services have prompted other Chinese EV makers to take bold steps.

[…]

While Geely is constructing battery swap stations on its own, other Chinese automakers have opted to build facilities along with domestic companies to share costs.

In September, state-owned Changan Automobile Co. launched its first battery swap station in Chongqing along with a consortium of other major domestic companies.

The partner companies include CATL, China’s largest EV battery maker; Aulton New Energy Vehicle Technology Co., a Shanghai-based battery swap station operator; and State Grid, a state-owned power grid operator.

In March, SAIC Motor Corp., another major state-owned automaker, also teamed up with Aulton to kick off operation of the first battery swap station for its EVs.

Aiways, an EV startup, tapped Blue Part Smart Energy, an EV charging facility operator under BAIC, in April to offer battery swap services.

This is all interesting to see from an American perspective, especially one based out of New York City. Around the turn of the century, NYC was home to the largest electric car company in the world, the Electric Vehicle Company, and it operated using battery-swapping stations right in the middle of Manhattan. The tech is basic. We could go down this route if we wanted to.

2nd Gear: Another Tesla Recall

Some 6,000 Tesla Model 3 and Model Ys are getting recalled for loose brake caliper bolts, as Reuters reports:

Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) is recalling nearly 6,000 U.S. vehicles because brake caliper bolts could be loose, with the potential to cause a loss of tire pressure, documents made public on Wednesday show.

The recall covers certain 2019-2021 Model 3 vehicles and 2020-2021 Model Y vehicles. Tesla’s filing with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said it had no reports of crashes or injuries related to the issue and that the company will inspect and tighten, or replace, the caliper bolts as necessary.

Tesla said that loose caliper bolts could allow the brake caliper to separate and contact the wheel rim, which could cause a loss of tire pressure in “very rare circumstances.” The company said that, in the “unlikely event” there is vehicle damage from a loose or missing fastener, it will arrange for a tow to the nearest service center for repair.

Advertisement

Hey, at least they got the bolts on there this time!

3rd Gear: Everyone Is Copying How Elon Talks

Another interesting Tesla story comes from Bloomberg, which has taken notice that everyone is not just copying Tesla’s plans to make attractive and desirable electric cars, but also how Tesla talks them up with ever-grander terminology. Per Bloomberg:

Many of the words speak to the sheer scale of Musk’s ambitions, which are always far grander than people realize initially. A battery factory isn’t just a battery factory, it’s a Gigafactory. (Giga comes from the Greek word “gigas,” or giant.)

A fast charging station for Tesla’s electric cars isn’t just a charging station, it’s a Supercharger. (Tesla has more than 25,000, giving them the largest network in the world.)

The battery packs that Tesla sells to utilities that promise “massive energy storage?” Megapacks.

There are no signs of him stopping. At Tesla’s “Battery Day” in September 2020, Musk talked about reaching “Terawatt-hour” scale battery production. “Tera is the new Giga,” Musk said on stage.

We’ve now reached the point where every battery factory — even those being made by competitors — is called a gigafactory, regardless of its physical size or planned output. “Nissan in advanced talks to build battery gigafactory in UK,” reported the Financial Times. “Stellantis discussing conditions with Rome to build gigafactory in Italy,” said Reuters.

Advertisement

Would Tesla be where it is if everyone just called gigafactories what they are? (They’re just regular factories.)

4th Gear: Toyota Scaling Back Olympic Plans

The Olympics in Japan seem to be still on somebody’s schedule, even if the people of Japan seem less than stoked on a global travel-fest in the midst of a still-ongoing global pandemic. Of course, this has huge implications for … high-profile industrial manufacturing that hopes to use the Olympics as a sales and marketing opportunity! Reuters has a broad report on it, and I’ll just take out this little section on Toyota:

For global sponsor Toyota Motor Corp., the Games were a chance to showcase its latest technology. It had planned to roll out about 3,700 vehicles, including 500 Mirai hydrogen fuel-cell sedans, to shuttle athletes and VIPs among venues.

It also planned to use self-driving pods to carry athletes around the Olympic village.

Such vehicles will still be used, but on a much smaller scale — a “far cry from what we had hoped and envisioned,” a Toyota source said. A full-scale Olympics, the source said, would have been a “grand moment for electric cars.”

A Toyota spokeswoman declined to comment on whether there were any changes to its marketing.

Advertisement

5th Gear: Biden Blocks Trump Plan For Arctic Drilling In Alaska

This is not a total win for climate, but it’s something, as the Financial Times reports:

The Biden administration has announced it will suspend the Arctic oil drilling rights sold in the last days of Donald Trump’s presidency, reversing a signature policy of the previous White House and handing a victory to environmentalists.

[…]

Tuesday’s decision marked a victory for environmentalists and activists, a pillar of Biden’s support in last year’s election, who have begun to grow impatient with some of the White House’s climate actions. The administration recently opted not to intervene to force the closure of the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline and has supported a major Alaska oil project approved during Trump’s term in office.

“In general the Biden administration is acting vigorously on climate change,” said Michael Gerrard, founder of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. “This action on ANWR is quite consistent with that. The actions on the other two projects do not seem so consistent.” 

Advertisement

I’ll take anything I can get at this point!

Advertisement

Neutral: How Is Your Car?

My Bug refused to start the other day just as I had loaded the car up for a multi-day road trip. With rain coming down, it refused to start even when I flagged down a ‘90s Infiniti for a jump. I ran out and got a new battery and it did start, but was running like shit until I found a half-bare wire leading to the coil. Some electrical tape later and we were on the road, though I’m still finding the car getting hot and leaking oil around some seals I know I just replaced. Stopping after one mountain pass I saw vapor rising out of one of the two carburetors. Time for a tune-up!

Here’s How Importing A Car From Europe Differs From Bringing One Over From Japan

Illustration for article titled Here's How Importing A Car From Europe Differs From Bringing One Over From Japan

Photo: Harnas kalisz / Wikimedia Commons (Other)

I recently purchased two vehicles at auctions in Japan. As one has reached America — and the other awaits its boat — this seems like a good time to answer some of your questions about vehicle importation. Many readers want to know how importing a car from Europe works.

Advertisement

Japan has an entire industry dedicated to selling cars to people in other countries. There are dozens of exporter websites, auction sites and companies that do nothing but funnel cars out of Japan to buyers overseas. Surely Europe would be similar, right?

As our David Tracy remarked last year, Germany is a goldmine for dirt cheap cars like the Renault Twingo. If you watch “Car Throttle” on YouTube, you’ll quickly notice that old cars sell for absurdly low prices in the UK, too. Europe is a continent bustling with vehicles just begging to be brought to America.

Europe does have some exporters in the business of helping you buy and import a vehicle from the Continent, but the industry doesn’t seem nearly as robust. You can go to just about any car buying website in Japan, find thousands of cars for sale and immediately get an estimated cost of putting that car on a ship to the States. You can find, buy and ship a car from Japan without leaving your couch here in America.

Illustration for article titled Here's How Importing A Car From Europe Differs From Bringing One Over From Japan

Photo: BMW

The same cannot be said for European car-buying sites . Not only are there fewer cars to choose from, but I’ve yet to find a site that can generate a shipping estimate on its own. The selling platforms aren’t built for export, unlike Japan’s car-selling sites. This means that you’ll have to call the dealership to complete the sale and arrange shipping.

Perhaps even more confusing: I could not find an easy way for a foreigner to access auctions in a country like Germany. Thinking that maybe I was missing something, I reached out to a few sources familiar with importing old cars from Europe.

Advertisement

Orchid Euro has been in the business of importing cars and parts for almost a decade. Orchid’s representative confirms that Europe doesn’t really have a thriving used-car exportation industry like Japan’s. To make matters worse, cars from Western Europe often head east or south, not to America like used Japanese cars do.

Lucas from Team Free Spirit spends a lot of time helping buyers of imported vehicles know exactly what they’re getting. He also confirms that getting a vehicle from Europe isn’t nearly as simple as bringing one from Japan.

Advertisement

So, how do you get that adorable Twingo into your hands here in America?

Illustration for article titled Here's How Importing A Car From Europe Differs From Bringing One Over From Japan

Photo: Renault

Advertisement

Lucas tells me that if you want to do the work yourself, you have to contact the private seller or dealership. If you’re lucky, they can help you pay for the vehicle and get it ready for the long journey. But more likely than not, you’ll need to have a local handle the transaction for you. This way, you can also have the vehicle inspected to make sure it’s worth purchasing in the first place.

Once you’ve purchased that vehicle, you have to prep it for shipping and find a carrier to haul it to America for you. Thankfully, Europe does have an expansive shipping industry to help you get your new ride on a truck, then onto a boat.

Advertisement

But if you don’t want to deal with all of that, you can hire an importer to do all of the annoying work. That way, you won’t have to deal with language barriers and playing a long game of Telephone across an ocean. If you want to embark on your own car importation journey, CarsDirect has a handy guide on how to avoid scams in importing cars from Europe.

Keep your vehicle importation questions coming! A number of you have also asked how to import a motorcycle from another country. That is a subject I will cover in the future.

Ferrari Is Finally Getting Off Its High Horse And Is Embracing Electric Cars

Illustration for article titled Ferrari Is Finally Getting Off Its High Horse And Is Embracing Electric Cars

Photo: Getty (Getty Images)

Ferrari has read the room. The Italian carmaker is finally admitting that electrification is where cars are heading — in its case, more like being dragged kicking and screaming. Nonetheless, Ferrari is now pushing its battery electric car release up by five years, according to a report from Bloomberg.

Advertisement

That means the Prancing Horse will adorn a fully electrified car by 2025, rather than 2030. This is a significant course correction for Ferrari who had been dismissive of EVs in the past. The Bloomberg report calls it reluctance.

undefined

Photo: Getty (Getty Images)

I think that assessment is a little generous when you consider the remarks from Ferrari’s previous leadership. The carmaker’s last chief executive officer, Louis Camilleri, all but claimed that its customers didn’t want a fully electric Ferrari. I think that attitude had very much to do with not going against the image Ferrari wanted to project, which under Camilleri was all about a certain lifestyle.

The problem is that attitude relegated EVs to something less urgent and necessary than they really are. It reinforced the notion that the wealthy are above any crises we collectively face. As if the electrification of the auto industry is beneath supercar buyers.

undefined

Photo: Ferrari

It’s quite a pretentious notion and I’m happy that Ferrari’s current chairman, John Elkann, has addressed the importance of getting an all-electric Ferrari on the road sooner. Elkann spoke to Ferrari’s EV plans on an investor call during Ferrari’s annual general meeting, from the Bloomberg report.

Advertisement

Besides sharing the new projections for the electric Ferrari, Elkann also elaborated on why the company is embracing EVs:

We are continuing to execute our electrification strategy in a highly disciplined way.

Our interpretation and application of these technologies both in motorsport and in road cars is a huge opportunity to bring the uniqueness and passion of Ferrari to new generations.

Advertisement

That’s a more sensible approach, and possibly a more lucrative one, too. New generations being the giveaway. The Camilleri approach feels silly because it tethers the company to an aging demographic.

Just think of storied companies and their reluctance to change for the sake of what, brand integrity? OK, Camilleri. Go ahead and ask Harley-Davidson what brand integrity is worth. Even Harley has had to course correct, and it put itself on the path to electrification with the LiveWire.

Advertisement

undefined

Photo: Ferrari

And it’s not like Ferrari hasn’t done anything at all in this arena. Though, the effort Ferrari has put into electrification has yielded only the SF90 Stradale so far, which feels like a tepid entry into the EV segment with it’s whopping eight mile electric range. But it is a Ferrari, for what that’s worth.

Advertisement

So, let’s see more, Ferrari, but stick to red and yellow; I actually do mean that one. Whatever BEV Ferrari debuts in 2025, I hope it puts zero EV accents on the car.

undefined

Photo: Getty (Getty Images)

Two BMW Electric Cars: One From The Factory And One Converted At Home

Illustration for article titled Two BMW Electric Cars: One From The Factory And One Converted At Home

Photo: Allan

One thing that I’ve been curious about is how homebrew electric car builds compare to OEM efforts at EVs, especially as we’re still in the early days of widespread manufacturer adoption. Jalopnik reader Allan has both: a 1983 E21 he converted himself and 2014 BMW i3 that doesn’t even want to see a wrench.

Advertisement

Welcome to EV Ownership Stories! Every week, we’ll be posting an interview with an owner of an electric vehicle. We’re here to show that people have been living with EVs for longer than you’d think, in stranger places than you’d imagine. If you’d like to be featured, instructions are at the bottom of the article.

As you can probably tell by this point in the series, I adore featuring stories about classic cars converted to electric vehicles. It’s so satisfying to look through my inbox and find the cars I grew up adoring given a new lease on life as modern hot rods.

And that brings us to this week’s pair of EVs owned by Allan, both bearing the roundel of the Bavarian Motor Works, but with vastly different execution. The first is his ’14 BMW i3 with a range extender, which of course comes chock full of creature comforts like adaptive cruise, one-pedal driving and smartphone connectivity, as well as the usual BMW fit and finish (albeit packaged in a much more quirky package than, say, an X3). The 650cc engine works as a gas generator that kicks on when the batteries are getting low, to eliminate range anxiety without needing to add a full ICE drivetrain like in a traditional parallel hybrid. Allan says quite simply, “the i3 does everything well, but I probably can’t fix it. I can’t even buy a manual to read about fixing it.” Basically, it makes a good daily driver, but it doesn’t satisfy his urge to wrench.

Illustration for article titled Two BMW Electric Cars: One From The Factory And One Converted At Home

Photo: Allan

Now we get to the second BMW in his EV collection, and this one can be wrenched on. Allan’s other electric BMW is a 1983 320is coupe with a DC motor, a five-speed manual transmission, and a 21 kWh battery system that provides over 60 miles of range “while driving any way [Allan] feels like.” He enjoys the E21 BMWs a lot (as he put it, to the point of mild addiction) and he’d had this specific one sitting around for a while. It was too nice to part out, but too rough to restore, and he immediately gravitated towards a budget EV build. It was a good way to do it justice and enjoy it. He’s been converting EVs on and off as part of his repair business for nearly 30 years, so he had the skills to build it. All he needed was a refresher on some of the more modern solutions available.

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled Two BMW Electric Cars: One From The Factory And One Converted At Home

Photo: Allan

The 320is is, as a result, an entirely homebrew conversion, built with fresh LFP batteries for juice and an Orion BMS2 from Shift EVs for power management. The rest of the system is cobbled entirely together out of other old, broken conversions Allan would find on EVFinder.com and purchase for parts. A BMW 2002 that had been converted to a DC motor helped him get his power plant, engine mount, and transmission adapter situation set up, and a converted ’90s Toyota Pickup donated its DC/DC converter, battery charger, and many other parts to the build.

Advertisement

Because he used other used builds for parts and sold off the non-EV components like the BMW 2002 shell, the conversion without the batteries was actually in the black. With the batteries and management system he bought new, the overall cost of the project came out to roughly $7,500. That’s the most cost-efficient homemade EV I’ve seen thus far, and it’s giving me really bad ideas about what I’d like my next project to be. I could maybe swing that cost.

Illustration for article titled Two BMW Electric Cars: One From The Factory And One Converted At Home

Photo: Allan

Advertisement

The E21, as Allan puts it, drives great:

“its entertainment value as an EV is just limitless. I can shift and hot rod if I want or just leave it in third gear and be lazy. And it’s a beast for pulling a trailer!”

Advertisement

The conversion actually allowed the car to lose 200 pounds, move the center of gravity backwards and downwards, and improve the weight balance of the car. Because it’s a DC motor powering it, the manual transmission is actually needed and the car has the fun of shifting with the linear response and quiet ride of a modern EV. Allan actually uses the E21 to test out differentials and transmissions he sells or puts into other cars. As he explains, “It is perfect for this job. No exhaust, heat shields, or fuel pump in the way, and it’s utterly silent. You can really hear any drivetrain noise!”

His verdict on the two cars is that they are a perfect pair: the i3 for a reasonable daily, capable of puttering around town in comfort, with a warranty, and no worries about range, and the E21 for pure fun and towing. He does admit he finds himself in his E21 more often than the i3 (or any of the other ICE cars he owns and works on, for that matter) and I really can’t say I’d blame him at all!

Advertisement

Thank you so much for sharing, Allan! We’d love to hear from more readers about their EVs, modern or classic, factory or otherwise.


We want:

Your name

What car do you own? (If you owned a car in the past, let us know what years!)

Where do you live with it?

How and where do you charge it?

How was buying it?

How long have you had it?

How has it lived up to your expectations?

A photo of your car

If you want to be interviewed, please let us know an email with an re: EV Ownership Stories to tscott at jalopnik dot com!

Train Crashes Into Houston Truck Carrying Ferrari SF90 Stradale, Other Exotics

Illustration for article titled Train Crashes Into Houston Truck Carrying Ferrari SF90 Stradale, Other Exotics

Screenshot: KHOU 11

Let’s gather ‘round and pour one out for the semi full of exotics that lost its life on April 1, 2021 in Houston, Texas. I wish it was an April Fool’s Joke. The hauler, carrying a Ferrari SF90 Stradale and a 488 Spyder, was unable to cross a set of railroad tracks in time before it was absolutely creamed by the oncoming train.

Advertisement

Everyone walked away fine without any fatalities or injuries, but the same can’t be said for the cars in the back of the hauler.

Moe Prince, a local who witnessed the crash, noted that the “the SF90 was fucked up… And I believe a Bentley. It was one of the cars where train struck it right in the middle. They didn’t pull it out,” as per Road & Track.

The investigation is still ongoing, but it appeared that the semi attempted to cross the train tracks and got stuck doing so, local paper The Leader reports. Despite the slow moving freight train, there wasn’t enough time to alert railroad officials to get them to slow it to a stop. The impact jackknifed the rig and pushed it a short distance from the intersection before coming to a halt, but it was enough to do the damage.

Road & Track reported that there were, among other cars, a dark-colored SF90 Stradale, a yellow 488 Spyder, a vintage white Porsche 911, and possibly a Bentley. The full contents of the truck, though, aren’t known. It only seems like the Stradale and the Bentley took the brunt of the hit, since those were likely the two vehicles closest to the point of impact.

Prince told Road & Track that it seemed the driver was unfamiliar with the area, which is what caused the accident. Whatever the case may be, it’s going to be a costly one—an SF90 Stradale alone clocks in at $625,000. 

Mini’s Electric Hot Hatch Might Debut As A Formula E Safety Car

Illustration for article titled Mini's Electric Hot Hatch Might Debut As A Formula E Safety Car

Image: Mini

We’ve known that an electric Mini JCW hot hatchback is in the works from the Brit brand by BMW. It’s an exciting proposition, one many of us are looking forward to, and it gets more exciting as the day draws nearer. In a tweet on Wednesday, Mini released the above teaser image with the caption “Feels like it’s time for a boost. Watch this space… #ElectricThrillMaximised” Does that mean Mini will be pacing the field at future Formula E events?

Advertisement

The current Formula E safety car is this unique roofless BMW i8 with a giant wing. The hybrid i8 sports car has been serving in this role since season 1 way back in 2014 when the i8 was a brand new car. It makes sense that the company would want to replace the aging i8 as the face of safety in one of the most advanced and forward-looking series in the world of motorsport. Not least because the i8 will be ending production soon, but also because BMW will be leaving Formula E at the end of this season.

Illustration for article titled Mini's Electric Hot Hatch Might Debut As A Formula E Safety Car

Image: BMW

With BMW out, and Mini’s commitment to electrification, this swap would make perfect sense. You can see from the light bar on the roof of the Mini that it matches the one currently in use on the BMW. Therefore, one could infer that this is the specification which will continue onward into Mini’s tenure as safety car.

I have high hopes for the electric JCW. The Mini Cooper SE electric is already considered one of the best handling electric cars on the market, so by extension the better handling JCW version should deliver more power and more on-track speed. Because Formula E tracks are typically quite tight, the Mini should be able to deliver on the job of safety car. Electric torque and nimble handling should be enough tools in the box for the effort.

Dammit, I’m going to have to buy one of these things, aren’t I?

With Mini almost sure to be running the Formula E safety car in the near future, how long will it be before Mini enters the sport as a manufacturer? While it’s certain that BMW is leaving FE, there’s nothing saying its compact car brand can’t pick up where it left off. It wouldn’t be the first time in this series, either, as Nissan’s FE program came out of Renault’s abandoning the sport.

Advertisement

I, for one, would love to see Mini racing in Formula E.

The C88 Concept Was A Fascinating Step Outside Porsche’s Comfort Zone

undefined

Image: Porsche

In what is probably the least-surprising piece of news I’ve heard so far in 2021, Porsche confirmed earlier this week it isn’t making that all-electric Vision Renndienst van concept it revealed to the public late last year. The Vision Renndienst was actually designed back in 2018, though it didn’t come to light until this past October, when Porsche pulled the covers off some of its hitherto unknown creations as part of a marketing blitz for its Porsche Unseen coffee table book. It looks like a nice book — I should have asked for it for Christmas.

Advertisement

Anyway, Porsche sales and marketing boss Detlev von Platen told Autoblog that while the Vision Renndienst presented a nice exercise for Stuttgart’s design team, it doesn’t really jell with the brand’s ethos:

We are, we were, and we still will be a sports car manufacturer. Therefore, we do not intend to go into the segment of small city cars, for example, or in segments where we could have more volume. We still are an exclusive sports car [brand], and we will go further in our development in segments where we believe that sports cars can be defined. So, going towards the minivan concept, and so on, is not our plan at all.

undefined

2018 Porsche Vision Renndienst Concept
Image: Porsche

Should Porsche make a sporty battery-electric van that looks like an old motorsport team support vehicle? While that would be pretty awesome, I can understand the apprehension.

Thing is, Porsche loves to explore the limits of its comfort zone every couple of years. The Porsche Unseen initiative was an illuminating peek behind the curtain to understand what the German sports car maker believes it can offer the rest of the automotive landscape. But if we dig back further — I’m talking 27 years ago — we can observe a good example of what happens when Porsche pools all its efforts to go somewhere new.

undefined

Image: Porsche

Advertisement

A New Pitch For The People’s Car

This robin’s egg-blue stunner was dubbed the C88. It is indeed a Porsche — even though you won’t find a Porsche badge anywhere on it — and it was a proposal for a sedan specifically designed for the Chinese market. Back in the ’90s, China didn’t have the homegrown auto industry it has today, and so it was heavily dependent on investment from foreign automakers. In an alternative universe, Porsche might’ve been one of them.

Advertisement

The impetus for the C88 proposal was a program started by the Chinese government seeking to partner established foreign automakers with state-backed manufacturers to produce high quality-yet-inexpensive family cars for the masses. The government was looking to develop its own automotive sector in two stages, as a C88 design document provided by Porsche explains:

In the first stage, from 1996, two to three large Chinese car manufacturers, who are also capable of competing on the international markets, and seven to eight smaller suppliers are to be established. The intention is then that the Chinese automotive industry should become autonomous in a second stage between 2005 and 2010. By this time, there should even be three to four major suppliers.

Advertisement

Porsche considered itself uniquely positioned to contribute to phase one of this plan. In 1994, it attended the Family Car Conference in Beijing, along with competitors including Chrysler, Fiat, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi and Opel, to pitch the C88 as the solution to China’s search for a four-door family car.

undefined

Image: Porsche

Advertisement

Because Porsche “manufactures only sports cars,” the company argued the Chinese government and local automakers could rest assured that Stuttgart wasn’t angling to steal their turf by “…building up a competitive product with the development of the Family Car.” I’m not sure how proving you could build a low-cost city car is supposed to allay fears from a potential collaborator and competitor that you’re not interested in building low-cost city cars, but I won’t pretend to fully understand Porsche’s rationale here.

If anything is clear from Porsche’s language about the C88, it’s that the company wasn’t simply developing this car in a consultancy role so it could hand the blueprints over and walk away. The car was to be built in China of course, but Porsche planned to “provide Chinese specialists with sufficient language and technical training in one year to enable them, at the end of that year, to develop the car together with the engineers in Weissach” — the home of Porsche’s R&D operations. Based on this timeline, the C88 would’ve entered production “by the turn of the century.”

Advertisement

undefined

Image: Porsche

A Porsche Unlike Any Other

Of course, absolutely none of this came to pass. Porsche did present the C88 at the Family Car Conference — it’s said that Porsche’s then-CEO Wendelin Wiedeking gave a speech entirely in Mandarin at the unveiling — and here we have the pictures of the car, as well as its planned specifications. The C88 was to be powered by a 1.1-liter, 67-horsepower four-cylinder, in tandem with either a five-speed manual transmission or four-speed automatic.

Advertisement

The whole thing weighed 2,160 pounds, and Porsche was outspoken about its high targets for safety and durability, surely applying lessons learned from its prior research in the field. In terms of design, the company aimed for something that would remain fresh for many years to come — a logical goal, considering Porsche knew the car wouldn’t make it to production for another five years at the latest.

Advertisement

“Numerous conversations” were shared with Chinese auto industry specialists and journalists, and to that end the C88 held “individual aesthetics which bear the stamp of Chinese culture.” The name and logo are indicative of this — 88 is a lucky number in Chinese culture, and the triangular, fidget spinner-looking insignia was supposed to evoke the ideal family unit of two parents and one child, per the country’s one-child policy at the time. The concept was even presented with a child’s seat in the back specially matched to the interior’s tweed aesthetic.

undefined

Image: Porsche

Advertisement

Personally, I’m charmed by the C88’s design. This thing looks like a proto-Ford Focus but even more quintessentially ’90s, with nary an edge or crease in sight and smooth, rounded forms abound. I love the amber turn indicators integrated between the fringes of the headlights and the black plastic front bumper, and I’m getting serious Daewoo and Suzuki vibes from the design of the rear. How about those shut lines for the trunk, repeating the shape of the taillights? I’m not saying the C88 is an aesthetic triumph or anything, but it cleans up nicely with my rose-tinted glasses on.

Inside, things get even weirder. The swoopy, highly asymmetrical dashboard would’ve been extremely modern for the time, and the cool shade of gray chosen for the plastics plays well against the beige upholstery on the seats. I have absolutely no idea what happened to the fuel and temperature gauges to the left of the speedometer, but I’m here for it — as I am for the analog clock encircled with icons you’d normally see in the instrument cluster.

Advertisement

undefined

Image: Porsche

Remember when I said a series of vehicles were on the table? The C88 is the only one Porsche ever prototyped, but the company envisioned two other models. The second seems as though it would have been highly modular; Porsche wanted to offer it in standard and premium variants, in a variety of potential body styles ranging from a two- or four-door fastback, to a wagon and even a pickup. The third, range-topping “luxury” model would’ve been another four-door, in sedan and notchback forms, and would have stood a chance at being exported to Europe.

Advertisement

The differential in price between the cheapest model proposed — the C88 — and the most expensive luxury four-door was significant, though not as profound as you might expect. Porsche was targeting 45,000 CNY for the C88 — about $14,000 adjusted for inflation. The modular second model would have cost the equivalent of about $18,700, while the priciest vehicle was targeting $25,000 in today’s money.

undefined

Image: Porsche

Advertisement

The End Of The Road

It’s clear Porsche did indeed have big ambitions for the C88, considering it thought through every facet of the project like it was ready for the green light at any moment. It’s also worth pointing out that Porsche was certainly not thriving financially during this time, suffering a brush with bankruptcy in 1992 detailed in this story from the New York Times. By 1994, the turnaround had begun thanks to Wiedeking’s production streamlining efforts. Nevertheless, the company’s first profit in four years didn’t come until early 1996.

Advertisement

It’s understandable, then, that Porsche would be interested in coming up with new ways of making money around the mid-’90s. And perhaps the C88 could have been one for the company, if the Chinese government didn’t cancel the family car project just several months after the world’s automakers submitted their proposals.

Why was it canned? We’ll probably never have a straight answer, though Porsche certainly had its theories. Here’s one from Porsche’s old archive manager, Dieter Landenberger, relayed in an interview with Top Gear in 2012:

“It only has one child seat because of the country’s policy on children”, Landenberger tells me, “and when we presented it, Dr Wiedeking [former CEO] learned his speech in Mandarin. But at the end it didn’t help. The Chinese government said thank you very much and took the ideas for free, and if you look at Chinese cars now, you can see many details of our C88 in them.”

Advertisement

I’m not exactly sure which elements Landenberger feels were copied later by Chinese automakers. In fact, I’ve reached out to Porsche to gain insight on this comment, to no avail. Porsche reportedly tried to sell the plans to Indian manufacturers when the Chinese market was no longer an option, according to CarNewsChina, but they too passed.

Thus ended the C88 saga. Today, Porsche retains the only full-size model of the vehicle in its museum. It serves as a reminder of what one of the world’s most influential sports car makers can do when it turns its attention outside its area of expertise. And although the C88 never came to be, nor did that neat electric van, it’s refreshing to know that attitude of using design and engineering to solve problems up and down the market still lives on within Porsche.

Nissan Should Have Made The Ariya Years Ago

Illustration for article titled Nissan Should Have Made The Ariya Years Ago

Photo: Nissan

The Ariya is one of Nissan’s best designs in a while. It feels like a return to form for the carmaker but I can’t help feel a sense of déjà vu as I take in its contours.

The Ariya looks a lot like the Murano concept sketch Nissan showed when the Murano debuted almost two decades ago and I am convinced that the Ariya owes some of its spirit to that old sketch.

Take a look at this new video which goes into detail about the Ariya’s design:

Who doesn’t love a good clay model, but the wind tunnel testing is what inspired me to make the comparison.

Advertisement

Now look at the design sketch of the Murano:

Illustration for article titled Nissan Should Have Made The Ariya Years Ago

Image: Nissan

It might not be a carbon copy or a perfect graft but damn if the Ariya doesn’t embody the spirit of that design sketch. It just took Nissan almost two decades.

Illustration for article titled Nissan Should Have Made The Ariya Years Ago

Image: Nissan

Advertisement

And here’s the Ariya design sketch:

Illustration for article titled Nissan Should Have Made The Ariya Years Ago

Illustration: Nissan

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled Nissan Should Have Made The Ariya Years Ago

Illustration: Nissan

Boy, I’ll never forget the feeling I had when I saw that Murano sketch. I recall encountering it for the first time and wanting nothing more than to trace it on a piece of paper. It felt like something out of time. It looked bold and new. It was daring! In the early aughts it truly felt like something out of a utopian future.

Advertisement

I understand that when it comes to design sketches, the essence will dilute as a car moves on through various phases and onto production. Even so, I resented the production Murano for some time afterwards, and Nissan, too. I just couldn’t forgive both for being unable to produce the same feeling as that sketch.

It may have been my reckoning with my own imagination, and a true sense of never meet your car heroes. Somehow, though, the Ariya changed very little as it went through to production.

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled Nissan Should Have Made The Ariya Years Ago

Photo: Nissan

What’s more, the Ariya not only finally delivers on the lofty design of the carmaker’s sketches, it also brings some of the carmaker’s best new tech with it.

Advertisement

I know I’ll be seeing the Ariya on public roads later this year, but I think it’s going to feel a little less like meeting someone new and a little more like seeing an old friend. Welcome back, Nissan.